By Robin Matross Helms, Senior Research Specialist at ACE, and Malika Tukibayeva, Graduate Research Associate at ACE
Student mobility – both the outward flow of students studying abroad and the inward flow of international students – has typically been a cornerstone of institutional internationalization plans. Sending students to other countries and populating the home campus with students from abroad, it was assumed, facilitates cross-cultural interactions and experiences that build students' global understanding and competency.
However, given changing student demographics, economic challenges, consistently low study abroad rates, and an increasing imperative to ensure that all students are prepared to live and work in a globalized world, institutions are recognizing the need to deliver international competency via the core student learning experience: the on-campus curriculum.
While an internationalized curriculum will look different on different campuses based on institution type and mission, student population, availability of resources, and other factors, there are four "levels" of the curriculum that require attention in order to create a comprehensively internationalized student learning experience: individual courses, academic program components (majors, minors, and certificates), degree programs, and disciplines as a whole.
This installment of Internationalization in Action focuses on the first of these levels (individual courses), and includes strategies, institutional models, expert advice, and other resources for institutions seeking to internationalize the curriculum "from the ground up." Subsequent installments of Internationalization in Action will tackle the other three levels of curriculum internationalization outlined above.
Read on to learn more!
Curriculum Internationalization by the Numbers
Data from
ACE's Mapping Internationalization on U.S. Campuses study indicate that curriculum internationalization is a priority for many colleges and universities. Overall, 55% of respondents to the 2011 survey reported that they have efforts underway to internationalize the curriculum, though as the chart below indicates, there was considerable variation by sector.
At some institutions, curriculum internationalization efforts are supported by designated institutional funding. In all sectors for which comparative data are available in the Mapping study, the percentage of institutions offering such funding has increased at least slightly since 2001, however the overall percentage remained unchanged between 2006 and 2011.